Influence of Original Native Mitral Valve Lesion (Stenosis or Steno-insufficiency vs. Insufficien… (NCT07151989) | Clinical Trial Compass
By InvitationNot Applicable
Influence of Original Native Mitral Valve Lesion (Stenosis or Steno-insufficiency vs. Insufficiency) on Post-implant Structural Bioprosthetic Degeneration After Mitral Valve Replacement
Netherlands3,500 participantsStarted 2024-01-01
Plain-language summary
It aims to perform a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. All patients undergoing elective mitral valve replacement from 2012 to 2021 who met the inclusion criteria for the study (described in the dedicated section) will be enrolled in the study. These patients will be followed-up as part of routine care, and information about the clinical status, NYHA functional class, possible rehospitalization, possible cardiovascular events and postoperative echocardiography will be available for analysis. Once consent is given, and if required by local governance, pre-, intra- and post-operative data will be collected in a dedicated, structured, database.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 18 years;
* Patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement for stenosis or regurgitation
* Signed informed consent, inclusive of release of medical information where required by local governance.
Exclusion Criteria:
* \- Aortic and mitral valve replacement associated with surgery of ascending aorta/aortic root;
* Aortic and mitral valve replacement associated with other cardiac valve surgery (apart from arrythmia-related ablation or procedures);
* Previous cardiac surgery of any kind;
* Surgery for acute endocarditis
* Surgery for Type A aortic dissection
* Participation in another clinical trial that could interfere with the endpoints of this study.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding at time of screening.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Prosthesis degeneration due to physiological deterioration