Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable

Perceived Effectiveness of Vaping Prevention Ads Among Adolescents and Young Adults

United States3,113 participantsStarted 2025-10-01

Plain-language summary

The purpose of the Aim 2 study is to assess the perceived effectiveness of vaping prevention ads among adolescents and young adults and identify which features of video ads predict perceived message effectiveness. Participants will include adolescents aged 13-17 and young adults aged 18-20 who live in the US and who are susceptible to vaping or who currently vape. In an online survey, participants will be randomized to view five randomly selected vaping prevention ads identified from a previous content analysis. After viewing the videos, participants will rate each video on the perceived message effectiveness scale and respond to questions about vaping appeal and urge to vape. The survey will take 15-20 minutes. A follow-up survey of a subset of participants will be conducted around two weeks after they have been exposed to vaping prevention video ads in the baseline survey. Participants will view a total of six videos, including the five videos they watched previously, shown one at a time, along with one "decoy" video ad. After watching each video ad, participants will indicate whether they remember seeing the ad in the survey they took around two weeks prior. The survey will take 10-15 minutes.

Who can participate

Age range

13 Years – 20 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 13-20 years old * Current vaper (defined as using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days) or susceptible to vaping. Participants will be considered 'susceptible to vaping' if they answer anything other than "definitely not" to 3 screening items assessing their susceptibility to vaping. An example item is, "If one of your best friends were to offer you a vape, would you use it?" (Definitely not, probably not, probably yes, definitely yes). * Live in the United States Exclusion Criteria: • Live outside of the United States

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Perceived Message Effectiveness

Timeframe: Baseline (Main study)

Recognition

Timeframe: Two-week Follow-up

Trial details

NCT IDNCT07116837

SponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-06-14

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Vaping trials