1. Background and Rationale Spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a devastating neurological condition with multidimensional consequences. While motor and sensory deficits are well-characterized, sexual dysfunction remains understudied despite its profound impact on quality of life. Current literature exhibits three critical gaps: (1) Limited longitudinal data on the temporal evolution of sexual dysfunction post-SCI, (2) Inadequate differentiation between psychogenic vs. neurogenic mechanisms in male patients, and (3) Heterogeneous outcome measures hindering cross-study comparisons。 This investigation builds upon pilot findings from our institution's SCI registry, where a large proportion of male participants reported clinically significant sexual impairment within 24 months post-injury. By employing standardized neuro-urological assessments alongside validated psychometric tools, this study aims to dissect the complex interplay between neurological lesion characteristics, endocrine profiles, and psychosocial adaptation processes. 2. Study Objectives Primary Objective To quantify the prevalence and severity trajectories of sexual dysfunction in males with SCI post-injury. Secondary Objectives To correlate lesion level with specific sexual function domains To identify predictors of sexual health recovery using multivariate regression modeling To establish normative data for the sexual function in SCI populations 3. Methodology 3.1 Study Design Prospective observational cohort with three nested substudies: Substudy A: Longitudinal biomechanical assessments Substudy B: Endocrine profiling Substudy C: Qualitative interviews exploring coping mechanisms 3.2 Participant Selection Inclusion Criteria: Males aged 18-60 years SCI confirmed by raiological methods or clinical symptoms Willing to participate in long-term follow-up Exclusion Criteria: Pre-existing sexual dysfunction History of prior surgical procedures Active psychiatric comorbidities 3.3 Data Collection Timeline Timepoint Assessments Baseline Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 3-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 12-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 24-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 36-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 48-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome 60-month Neurological function, sexual function, raiological outcome
Age range
18 Years – 60 Years
Sex
MALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT)
Timeframe: baseline (before injury), immediately after injury, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months after surgery
International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5)
Timeframe: baseline (before injury), immediately after injury, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months after surgery
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
Timeframe: baseline (before injury), immediately after injury, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months after surgery