Comparison of Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome (NCT07079449) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Comparison of Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Turkey (Türkiye)75 participantsStarted 2025-05-01
Plain-language summary
This randomized clinical trial will aim to compare the effectiveness of dry needling, lidocaine injection, and mepivacaine injection in the treatment of myofascial pain in the masticatory muscles. A total of 75 participants with bilateral active trigger points in the masseter and/or temporalis muscles will be enrolled and randomly assigned to three intervention groups. Each participant will receive weekly treatments for three weeks. Pain levels, depressive symptoms, and temporomandibular disorder severity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. Outcome measures will be recorded at baseline and one week after the final treatment session. The primary objective of this study is to determine which intervention provides the greatest improvement in myofascial pain symptoms.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 64 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adults aged 18 to 64 years
* Presence of bilateral active myofascial trigger points in both the masseter and temporalis muscles
* Pain provoked by approximately 1 kg of external digital pressure on trigger points
* Willingness to participate and provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Previous or ongoing treatment for temporomandibular disorders (e.g., occlusal splints, botulinum toxin injections)
* Presence of systemic neuromuscular disease
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, or antidepressants within the past 2 weeks
* Active infection, tumor, or trauma in the orofacial region
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in pain intensity based on the Visual Analog Scale
Timeframe: Baseline and one week after the third injection