By InvitationNot Applicable

Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Lebanon24 participantsStarted 2025-07-01

Plain-language summary

Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique

Who can participate

Age range25 Years – 45 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Patient age 25 to 45 years old
✓. Systemically and periodontally healthy individuals.
✓. Non-smokers or light smokers (Less than 5 cigarettes a day) (Schane 2010).
✓. Good oral hygiene.
✓. Healthy remaining dentition.
✓. Adequate quality and quantity of bone
✓. Interradicular septum ≥ 2 mm (Bleyan, 2022).
✓. Mandibular non-restorable molars.

Exclusion criteria

✕. Acute inflammation or infection in the implant region.
✕. Patients with mental disorders who could not cooperate with treatment or communicate normally.
✕. Patients who have severe systemic disorders (Uncontrolled Diabetes, Uncontrolled Hypertension, End stage kidney or liver diseases and Severe Heart diseases) .
✕. Poor oral hygiene.
✕. Active periodontal disease.
✕. Uncooperative patients, not willing to adhere to post-surgical instructions and follow up visits.

What they're measuring

Interradicular bone width

Timeframe: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)

Dental implant stability

Timeframe: up to 4 months after dental implant placement

Trial details

NCT IDNCT07077915

SponsorMohamad Ali Itani

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-12-23

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Immediate Dental Implant Placement trials