Corneal Neurotization vs. Cenergermin for Neurotrophic Keratitis: A Pilot Study (NCT07073729) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Corneal Neurotization vs. Cenergermin for Neurotrophic Keratitis: A Pilot Study
Canada10 participantsStarted 2025-08-01
Plain-language summary
This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of two treatment approaches for corneal sensory dysfunction due to neurotrophic keratitis (NK): corneal neurotization surgery and topical Cenergermin (Oxervate). Participants will receive treatment based on clinical decision-making, not randomization, and will be followed for 12 months through eight visits at the Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London. Data collected during routine eye examinations and validated quality-of-life questionnaires will be used to assess visual outcomes, corneal structure and function, and patient-reported well-being. This feasibility study is funded by the Lawson Research Institute Internal Research Fund and is intended to generate preliminary evidence for a future randomized trial.
Who can participate
Age range
19 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adults aged 19 years and older.
* Diagnosis of neurotrophic keratitis with reduced or absent corneal sensation.
* Clinical indication for either corneal neurotization surgery or topical Cenergermin treatment, as determined by the treating ophthalmologist.
* Ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Active ocular infection or inflammation.
* Previous corneal neurotization procedure in the affected eye.
* Contraindications to general anesthesia or surgical intervention.
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 3 months.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in Corneal Sensitivity
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months post-treatment
Trial details
NCT IDNCT07073729
SponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's