Since 2019, long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Switzerland have been required by the Federal Insurance Law (KVG, Art. 59a) to report data for the calculation and public reporting of medical quality indicators (MQIs) in four clinical domains: polypharmacy, pain, malnutrition, and physical restraints. This data serves both for monitoring care quality at the national level through public reporting and for internal quality development. Contextual analysis showed that various quality development methods are already known and used in Swiss LTCFs. However, significant challenges remain: limited resources, time constraints, and restricted access to MQI data hinder effective use. Facilities reported a greater need for support in using MQI data. They also expressed interest in peer networking, structured support for applying quality methods (such as Plan Do Check Act cycles (PDCA)), and practical tools such as training, best-practice examples, and additional resources. Residents and relatives also expressed a strong interest in being more involved in decision-making and care quality discussions. The overall aim of the current study is to test a quality development training programme that supports LTCFs in using MQI data for continuous data-driven care quality development. The study is structured into three thematic areas: 1. MQI Results Literacy - Supporting LTCFs in interpreting MQI reports and benchmarks. 2. Impactful Actions - Supporting LTCFs to translate MQI results into concrete quality development actions using PDCA cycles. 3. Sparking Culture - Integrating data-driven quality development into everyday practice and fostering a culture of continuous development, with a strong emphasis on strengthening the involvement of residents, relatives, and leadership. The study follows a train-the-trainer strategy. Trainers instructed by the NIP-Q-UPGRADE research team provide structured training and coaching to Quality Leaders and management representatives of LTCFs. Quality Leaders then support their co-workers in quality development. The training programme consists of online and in-person trainings, training materials, practical tools, a website, guided tasks for facilities, and an email helpdesk for ongoing support. Study outcomes: This sub-study of the NIP-Q-UPGRADE programme aims to assess the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and costs related to the training programme, both at the facility level and at the trainer level.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Acceptability of the training and support program - Survey
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers
Timeframe: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - focus groups
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Feasibility of the training and support program - Survey
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers
Timeframe: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - focus groups
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Implementation fidelity - survey
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - qualitative interviews semi-structured with managers
Timeframe: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - focus groups
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - focus groups
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews
Timeframe: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - focus group
Timeframe: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews
Timeframe: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Sum of costs associated with implementation of the toolkit in Swiss francs
Timeframe: Monthly up to 3 months