HVNI vs NIPPV in Type 2 Respiratory Failure (NCT07065656) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
HVNI vs NIPPV in Type 2 Respiratory Failure
84 participantsStarted 2025-11-01
Plain-language summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) is comparable to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in treatment of emergency patients with acute respiratory acidosis. In our non-inferiority trial, we hypothesize that HVNI is inferior to NIPPV in reducing PaCO2 in type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF) due to any cause by a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 4.3% decrease in PaCO2 levels after 30 minutes of treatment. The primary aim is to evaluate if HVNI is non-inferior to NIPPV in reducing PaCO2 levels in patients with T2RF from any cause. Eligible patients will be randomized to HVNI (intervention) or NIPPV (control).
Who can participate
Age range
21 Years – 99 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* adult patients aged 21 years and above, who require NIPPV for T2RF due to any cause in the Emergency Medicine Department of the National University Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
* patients with "do-not-resuscitate" orders that include NO non-invasive ventilation use \[patients with max NIV status will still be included\]
* clinical suspicion or confirmed diagnosis of base of skull fractures or severe facial trauma that precludes NIPPV or nasal cannula placement
* vulnerable patient populations (e.g., pregnant women, prisoners)
* patients who refused consent
* hemodynamic instability (e.g., hypotension requiring immediate resuscitation), cardiac or respiratory arrest
* patients who require emergency intubation
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.