A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of MINIject S+ in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma (NCT07009236) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of MINIject S+ in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma
Honduras, United Kingdom60 participantsStarted 2025-09-29
Plain-language summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, international, cohort expansion study. Part 1 will be conducted in subjects with open angle glaucoma to identify the best insertion tool for MINIject S+. In Part 1, three different investigational insertion tools will be used to place MINIject implants in this first-in man study. Each arm represents a different version of the insertion tool. Subject and independent central reader will be blinded to the insertion tool used to implant MINIject S+. Part 2 will be an expansion phase where the selected insertion tool will be assessed in a larger population of subjects with open angle glaucoma and operable cataracts undergoing combined glaucoma and cataract surgery (with IOL implantation).
Who can participate
Age range
20 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Males or females, 20 years of age or older
. Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) in the study eye
. Iridocorneal angle grade 3 (open, 20-35 degrees) or grade 4 (wide open, 35-45 degrees) according to Shaffer Angle Grading System in all quadrants of the study eye. (For subject's undergoing combined cataract extraction (with IOL implantation) with MINIject implantation, a grade 2 angle is acceptable prior to cataract surgery so long is the angle becomes grade 3 or greater prior to MINIject implantation).
. Glaucoma not adequately controlled with at least one topical hypotensive medication(s), unless the subject has an allergy / intolerance to a medication or inability to consistently access medication. Examples include but are not limited to prostaglandins, beta blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors or alpha-2-agonists
. Minimal visual acuity in the study eye must be 35 letters EDTRS (20/200) or better and 50 letters ETDRS (20/100) or better in the fellow eye
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Number of patients with correct placement of the device in the supraciliary space, as assessed by the blinded central reader
. Subjects must be willing and able to follow study instructions and to return for scheduled study-related examinations
. Subjects must provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures
Exclusion criteria
. Grade 2 (narrow, 20 degrees), grade 1 (extremely narrow, less or equal to 10 degrees) and grade 0 (closed or slit) iridocorneal angle according to Shaffer Angle Grading System in the study eye except for the situation described in inclusion criterion #3.
. Any eye surgery that was performed \< 90 days before Screening/Baseline visit in the study eye
. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with HbA1C \>7%
. Known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to medical silicone
. Allergy to fluorescein
. Corneal opacity or iridocorneal angle not visible through gonioprism in the study eye, preventing correct placement of the implant
. Central endothelial cell density (ECD) at Screening visit with a mean value \<1900 cells/mm2 or coefficient of variation (CV) of endothelium \>0.45 A variance of 5% less than this cell count is permitted if in the clinical judgement of the Investigator the potential benefit/risk to subject participation is favorable and the central corneal endothelial morphology is characterized as normal by the usual criteria of hexagonality, polymorphism, and polymegathism
. Anticipated need for ocular surgery or retinal laser procedure in the study eye