Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the only curative option for many hematological maligancies. The main cause of death following HSCT is the relapse of the original disease. Few strategies have been developed to prevent relapse after bone marrow transplantation. New prophylactic strategies are needed to decrease the relapse incidence without increasing the non-relapse mortality in the post-transplant area. Several drugs are currently being explored as maintenance in several AML subgroups such as FLT3 ITD/mutated AML. A specific group of AML patients display the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) internal tandem duplication (ITD) or mutation. These recurrent genetic abnormalities account for 30-35% of all AML patients. Because FLT3 is a tyrosine kinase, it can be targeted using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Originally limited to first generation sorafenib and Midostaurin, the FLT3 TKI now include second generation Gilteritinib, crenolanib and quizartinib13. Because many FLT3 AML patients would relapse after aHSCT, the use of sorafenib, the only FLT3 TKI available at that time, in a post-transplant setting started to be evaluated. Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that not only inhibit FLT3 but also the RAS, RAF, KIT, and the VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Several retrospective trials reported the safety and efficiency of a sorafenib maintenance. In recent years, a mounting piece of evidence suggests that sorafenib may have an impact on several immune cells as T cell populations, dendritic cells, macrophages and myeloid-derived immunosuppressor cells (MDSC). Other more potent and more specific FLT3 inhibitors are currently under investigation both in combination with chemotherapy before transplantation and as post transplantation maintenance. In this line, crenolanib and Gilteritinib are two potent and more specific TKI that proved more effective than sorafenib in the treatment of FLT3 ITD/TKD relapsed, refractory AML patients. These drugs demonstrated a higher response rate in R/R patients. These two drugs are part of the future standard of care in FLT3 AML but their immunological impact has never been studied. At a time where cellular therapies (allogeneic stem cell transplantation but also CAR T cells) and targeted therapies are becoming the central point of cancer treatment, it appears mandatory to better understand the interactions between the two. The goal of our research project which covers fundamental and clinical aspects of AML post-transplant treatments is devoted to a better understanding of the impact of Gilteritinib on the immune cells in order to rationalize their use after aHSCT. A better characterization of the action of these drugs on the immune system is urgently needed to develop new prophylactic strategies which could decrease the relapse incidence without increasing the non-relapse mortality in the post-transplant area. This program is proposed for a period of 3 years, time necessary to perform all the in vitro and ex vivo approaches and to recruit a sufficient number of patients eligible for aHSCT.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Assess the off-target effects of Gilteritinib on the phenotype of immunity cells
Timeframe: At 3 months, 6 months, 1 year post maintenance start
Assess the off-target effects of Gilteritinib on the function of immunity cells
Timeframe: At 3 months, 6 months, 1 year post maintenance start
Assess the off-target effects of Gilteritinib on the metabolism of immunity cells
Timeframe: At 3 months, 6 months, 1 year post maintenance start