A Multicentre, Retrospective-prospective Real-world Study: to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safe… (NCT06969352) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
A Multicentre, Retrospective-prospective Real-world Study: to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Vorasidenib in Patients With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase IDH1/2 Mutant Grade 2 Astrocytoma or Oligodendroglioma (VICTORIA Study)
China60 participantsStarted 2025-06
Plain-language summary
The goal of this Study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Vorasidenib in Patients with Isocitrate dehydrogenase IDH1/2 mutant Grade 2 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, primary purposeis to evaluate the efficectiveness of Vorasidenib in glioma patients treated in routine clinical practice in In China, patients aged 12 and above with grade II or higher astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The main question it aims to answer is:
if this trend is consistent with the efficacy observed in the INDIGO study, and there is not any new safety signal compared to previous research data? Researchers will compare to no treatment. Participants is not mandatory for a formal visit as it is a real-word study.However, due to the fact that patients will be treated with new drugs and need to collect data on major efficacy, regular visits should be performed in routine clinical practice.
This study is a multicenter, retrospective-and prospective real-world study, There are treatment group (Vorasidenib) and external control group (untreated after surgery).
Who can participate
Age range
12 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Exclusion criteria
. Patients (female and male) aged ≥ 12 years at enrolment.
. Patients with tissue-confirmed diagnoses of Grade 2 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with IDH1 or IDH2 mutation
. Have undergone at least one prior glioma surgery (biopsy, subtotal resection, or complete resection).
. Patients with evaluable disease based on the most recent MRI in the opinion of the treating physician. A measurable non-enhanced lesion is defined as at least one target lesion with dimensions of ≥1 cm × ≥1 cm (in two dimensions). Confirmed by a centralized IRC as minimal, non-nodular, and non-measurable enhancement.
. The PI evaluates based on the Vorasidenib label and patients is willing plan to receive Vorasidenib
. Be able to understand and provide written informed consent if the patient is 18 years or older, or if the patient is a minor (12 years or older and under 18 years), both the patient and their legal representative must sign the informed consent.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.