Study Title Comparison of Maxillary Accuracy Between Virtual and Conventional Surgical Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Design * Type: Prospective, single-center, randomized, blinded, case-controlled trial * Location: National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City * Period: August 2023 - February 2025 * Sample size: 20 patients * Ethical approval: Granted by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCMC (Approval No. 647/HĐĐĐ-ĐHYD) Inclusion Criteria * Patients aged 18-30 years * Diagnosed with malocclusion requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgery * Completed presurgical orthodontic treatment Exclusion Criteria * Cleft lip/palate, craniofacial syndromes * Deformities due to trauma, tumors, or iatrogenic causes * TMJ disorders * History of previous orthognathic surgery * Planned multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy Randomization and Blinding * All patients underwent both 2D and 3D surgical planning. * Two splints (CSP and VSP) were fabricated for each patient. * Intraoperative randomization was performed by an OR nurse. * The surgical team and data analysts were blinded to group allocation. * Groups were revealed only after data analysis. Groups * Test group (VSP): 3D virtual planning, simulation, and 3D-printed splints * Control group (CSP): 2D cephalometric planning, model surgery, conventional resin splints Surgical Procedure * All patients underwent Le Fort I and BSSO * Maxilla-first approach with fixation using 4 miniplates * Mandibular repositioning using final splint and fixed with 2 miniplates per side * All surgeries performed by a single experienced surgeon Data Collection \& Measurements * CT scans before and 2 weeks after surgery * Superimposition using Invivo 7.0 software (voxel-based registration) * Measured landmark changes (A point, ANS, U1, U3, U6) in X (medial-lateral), Y (anterior-posterior), and Z (vertical) directions * Compared: * 2D plan (P2D) vs. 3D plan (P3D) * P3D vs. actual postoperative result * VSP vs. CSP accuracy Statistical Analysis * ICC used to test measurement reliability (10 patients, remeasured after 2 weeks) * Normality tested * Paired t-test/Wilcoxon for planned vs. actual * Independent t-test/Mann-Whitney for between-group comparisons * Significance set at p \< 0.05
Age range
18 Years – 30 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Differences in the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superoinferior changes of the maxillary landmarks were calculated to assess accuracy and validate the effectiveness of virtual surgical planning
Timeframe: From August 2023 to February 2025