Comparison of Elranatamab and Lenalidomide Versus Daratumumab and Lenalidomide as Post-transplant… (NCT06931704) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingPhase 2
Comparison of Elranatamab and Lenalidomide Versus Daratumumab and Lenalidomide as Post-transplant Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma (ElMMA)
France176 participantsStarted 2025-05-01
Plain-language summary
Lenalidomide is a standard of care for maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Recently, two large phase 3 randomized trials demonstrated a progression free survival benefit with daratumumab maintenance post autologous stem cell transplantation. Bispecific antibodies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen are approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory myeloma patients after 3 prior lines of therapy including proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulator IMiD and anti CD38 monoclonal antibody. In the cohort A of the MAGNETISMM-3 phase 2 study (n=123), elranatamab single-agent demonstrated strong efficacy with favorable safety profile in patients with advanced multiple myeloma (median of 5 prior lines, 96% of patients with triple class refractory disease). Lenalidomide has been shown to promote cytotoxic activity of CD3 bispecific antibodies. 7We propose a phase 2 randomized study comparing elranatamab plus lenalidomide versus daratumumab plus lenalidomide for 2 years as post-transplant maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The primary objective is minimal residual disease rate after one year of maintenance. Secondary objectives include Progression-Free Survival, safety, quality of life, return to work and overall survival.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. \- Male or female subjects, 18 years of age or older
. \- Voluntary written informed consent must be given before performance of any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that the subject may withdraw consent at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
. \- Subject must have documented multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and have received 4 to 6 cycles of quadruplet-based therapy including proteasome inhibitor, IMID and anti CD38 monoclonal antibody.
. \- Subject must have received only one line of therapy and achieved at least a partial response as per IMWG 2016 criteria.
. \- Subject must have received high-dose melphalan and ASCT within 12 months of the start of induction therapy and be within 6 months of the last ASCT at the time of first treatment dose.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate
Timeframe: At the beginning of cycle 13 (each cycle is 28 days)
. \- Subject must have NGS analysis performed at time of MM diagnosis and/or adequate stored bone marrow material allowing NGS analysis (IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France) in order to calibrate MRD analysis.
. \- Karnofsky performance status score ≥ 50% (eastern cooperative oncology group performance status ECOG score ≤ 2).
. \- Subject must have clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:
Exclusion criteria
. \- Subjects have received any prior anti BCMA therapy.
. \- Subject have received post transplantation maintenance therapy.
. \- Subject intolerant to lenalidomide or have discontinued treatment due to any AE related to lenalidomide.
. \- Subject is exhibiting clinical signs of meningeal involvement of multiple myeloma.
. \- Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment according to NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
. \- Uncontrolled hypertension.
. \- Subjects with known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 50% of predicted normal. Note that FEV1 testing is required for patients suspected of having COPD and subjects must be excluded if FEV1 \< 50% of predicted normal.
. \- Subjects with a history of moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years, or with uncontrolled asthma of any classification at the time of screening (Note that subjects who currently have controlled intermittent asthma or controlled mild persistent asthma are allowed in the study).