2\. Purpose and Significance of the Study (Primary and Secondary Objectives, if any) Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a clinical condition characterized by partial or total loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions below the level of the lesion, depending on the severity and level of the injury, which may be caused by traumatic or non-traumatic factors. Globally, the incidence of SCI is estimated to be 250,000-500,000 cases per year . SCI patients may be classified as tetraplegic or paraplegic according to their functional levels. In paraplegia, there is a loss of function in both lower extremities, whereas tetraplegic patients experience functional loss in all four extremities. In both groups, autonomic dysfunctions in visceral organs can also be observed depending on the severity of the injury below the lesion level. In tetraplegic patients, loss of upper extremity and hand functions significantly reduces their level of independence in daily living activities, particularly in self-care tasks, and considerably lowers their quality of life. Therefore, upper extremity and hand rehabilitation play a crucial role in the comprehensive rehabilitation program for tetraplegic patients. Various rehabilitative modalities have been used both in clinical practice and in the literature to improve upper extremity and hand functions. The use of advanced rehabilitation technologies has increased in recent years. Studies on functional electrical stimulation (FES) for upper extremity, robotic rehabilitation, virtual reality applications, mirror therapy, and similar approaches have become more prevalent in the literature . However, there is a limited number of studies comparing the superiority of these rehabilitation techniques in tetraplegic patients, leading to insufficient data for selecting the most appropriate rehabilitative technologies in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the effects of FES, robotic rehabilitation, and occupational therapy on upper extremity and hand functions in tetraplegic patients. Additionally, it seeks to determine which patient groups, based on their clinical and demographic characteristics, would benefit the most from each therapy and to contribute to the development of personalized rehabilitation strategies by analyzing outcomes in the acute, subacute, and chronic phases of SCI.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
Timeframe: Evaluation at Treatment Start and 4 Weeks Later
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Timeframe: Evaluation at Treatment Start and 4 Weeks Later
Hand Grip Strength Assessment (Using a Dynamometer)
Timeframe: Evaluation at Treatment Start and 4 Weeks Later
Pinch Grip Strength (Pinchmeter)
Timeframe: Evaluation at Treatment Start and 4 Weeks Later
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA):
Timeframe: Evaluation at Treatment Start and 4 Weeks Later