Background: Blood-based biomarkers show promise in predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and progression; however, inconsistencies in detection standards hinder clinical application. A head-to-head comparison of commercially available biomarkers is crucial for optimizing the clinical pathway for AD screening and diagnosis. Method: The CLEAR-AD study is an ongoing population-based cross-sectional study, currently recruiting 400 participants in ten centers in China. The study includes cognitively normal controls, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) - categorized as amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative - as well as patients with dementia, also divided into amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups. All participants undergo amyloid PET scans using tracers such as AV1, AV45, and PIB. Blood samples are collected within three months prior to the PET scan or from existing samples collected after January 1, 2024, that meet quality standards. After collection, these samples are analyzed at a central laboratory under blinded conditions using multiple detection methods to measure plasma levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau181/217. The detection technologies included single-molecule immunoassay, digital immunoassay chips, magnetic particle chemiluminescence, and flow cytometry fluorescence. The objective is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of different plasma biomarker levels in predicting amyloid pathology confirmed by Aβ-PET. Result: The study uses Aβ-PET as the reference standard to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various AD plasma biomarkers across different detection methods in diagnosing amyloid pathology. The analysis included generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, determining optimal cut-off values, and developing a predictive model that integrates multiple biomarker parameters and clinical data. Results is considered statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05.
Age range
45 Years – 85 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of blood biomarkers in predicting amyloid pathology confirmed by Aβ-PET under different testing methods
Timeframe: 2025.08