Efficacy and Safety of Catheter abLation in patiEnts With seVere mitrAl regurgiTation and pErsist… (NCT06883864) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Efficacy and Safety of Catheter abLation in patiEnts With seVere mitrAl regurgiTation and pErsistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
China146 participantsStarted 2025-04-08
Plain-language summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) leads to atrial functional mitral regurgitation (MR) through mechanisms including mitral annular dilatation, systolic leaflet motion distance alteration, and contractility decrease. Compared with primary MR, atrial functional MR due to AF and other diseases tends to have a worse prognosis, with a higher risk of death and heart failure hospitalization. MR and AF co-exist and exacerbate left atrial dysfunction, further causing worse cardiac dysfunction, valvular regurgitation, and aggravating prognosis.
The best therapy for secondary MR is unclear because MR is only one component of the disease, and restoration of mitral valve competence is not curative. Catheter ablation improves symptoms and cardiac function in patients with AF, reduces risks of AF recurrence and hospitalization, as well as increases quality of life. For patients with AF combined with functional moderate-to-severe MR, previous observational studies have found that the severity of MR significantly reduced after taking catheter ablation to restore sinus rhythm. We hypothesized that catheter ablation would significantly improve the severity of MR in patients with severe atrial functional MR combined with persistent AF compared with drug therapy alone.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Patients were required to have moderate-to-severe or greater (≥3+) atrial functional mitral regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography within 14 days before randomization. Mitral regurgitation severity was graded by an echocardiography core-lab based on the American Society of Echocardiography criteria, specifically an effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) ≥30 mm²
. Age 18-80 years
. Persistent atrial fibrillation diagnosed by electrocardiogram
. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% assessed by transthoracic echocardiography within 14 days before randomization(confirmed by the echocardiography core-lab)
. Left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter ≤60 mm and left atrial anterior- posterior diameter ≤60 mm in echocardiographic parasternal long-axis view within 14 days before randomization(confirmed by the echocardiography core-lab)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with residual MR of moderate [2+] or less assessed by transthoracic echocardiography at 3 months.