Electrical Impedance Tomography-derived Flow Index During Spontaneous Breathing Trial Stratifies … (NCT06876792) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Electrical Impedance Tomography-derived Flow Index During Spontaneous Breathing Trial Stratifies the Risk of Reintubation Within 48 h After Extubation
China150 participantsStarted 2024-12-01
Plain-language summary
Accurate prediction of readiness to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation remains challenging. Conventional indices such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) often miss early signs of injurious breathing patterns or regional ventilation asynchrony that can lead to extubation failure. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) provides continuous, non-invasive imaging of regional lung ventilation. We developed a novel EIT-derived Flow Index (FI) which integrates the magnitude of inspiratory effort with the temporal synchrony of lung filling. This prospective, multicenter observational study aimed to (1) validate the predictive value of FI during spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) compared with conventional weaning indices, and (2) compare the predictive ability of EFI with traditional weaning indices(RSBI,MIP,P0.1).
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 90 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥18 years
* Acute respiratory failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation ≥48 hours
* Hemodynamic stability (no escalation of vasoactive agents)
* Oxygenation: FiO₂ ≤0.5, PEEP ≤8 cmH₂O
* Meeting standard ICU criteria for SBT readiness
Exclusion Criteria:
* Neuromuscular diseases impairing spontaneous breathing
* High cervical spinal cord injury
* Deep sedation (RASS ≤-3)
* Inadequate EIT signal quality
* Contraindications to EIT
* Pregnancy
* Expected survival \<24 h
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) Success Rate
Timeframe: Within 30 minutes of Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT)