Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Topical Medical Device in Wound Healing and Symptom Relief i… (NCT06872151) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 4
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Topical Medical Device in Wound Healing and Symptom Relief in the Postoperative Period of Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy (The Emor Study)
Italy114 participantsStarted 2025-03-04
Plain-language summary
This multicenter randomized controlled phase IV trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy of a gel containing a Propionibacterium extract and a gel with hyaluronic acid and silver sulfadiazine in the degree of epithelialization of post-operative wounds of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* To compare the efficacy of the two medical devices in the degree of epithelialization in the postoperative period of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy, at 0, 10, 20 and 40 days from the beginning of treatment.
* To evaluate the effectiveness of these devices in alleviating: pain, itching, burning, and the type of bowel habit Participants will be randomized, at the beginning of the study, to one of the two treatments, and the efficacy of the two medical devices will be evaluated at 0, 10, 20 and 40 days from the start of treatment.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Open excisional hemorrhoidectomy, with removal of at least 3 groups
* Age between 18 and 75 years
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients who do not consent to the study
* Opioid-dependent patients, chronic use of analgesics
* Fecal incontinence
* Anorectal neoplasms
* Immunosuppressive treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.)
* Chronic inflammatory bowel diseases
* Pregnancy
* Patients with major psychiatric disorders
* Known allergy to the components of the treatments under study
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Degree of epithelialization
Timeframe: From baseline to visit 3 (40 days after the start of the treatment)