Study of the Adequacy Between Calcium Supplementation and Dietary Intake in Treatment-naive Patie… (NCT06847087) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Study of the Adequacy Between Calcium Supplementation and Dietary Intake in Treatment-naive Patients After a Fracture
France86 participantsStarted 2025-04-03
Plain-language summary
Osteoporosis is a disease that causes many fractures. However, treatments exist such as anti-osteoporotic treatments, vitamin D supplementation and an adaptation of calcium intake. 80% of patients with an indication for anti-osteoporotic treatment are never treated with these anti-osteoporotic treatments after a first fracture. On the other hand, more than 84% of them are supplemented with calcium and vitamin D. It often appears in the practice of rheumatologists that some patients are supplemented while their dietary intake is sufficient, and vice versa. The objective of the study is therefore to take stock of the (in)adequacy between the dietary intake of patients and the supplementation prescribed to them following an osteoporotic-like fracture.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patient meeting a first rheumatologist after a fracture suspected of being due to bone insufficiency, whether or not he is already treated for osteoporosis
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patient followed in one of the three investigation centers within the framework of the bone sector.
* Patient affiliated to a social security system
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patient refusing to participate in the study
* Patient already followed by a rheumatologist
* Legal incapacity or any physical, psychological, social or geographical condition likely to hinder the patient's ability to participate in the study
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Number of patients deficient, within the norm and above the norm with or without supplementation