CompletedNot Applicable

Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy

Egypt245 participantsStarted 2024-07-01

Plain-language summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy . The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence? Participants will: will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms

Who can participate

Age range2 Years – 18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * all patients aged 2 to 18 years * patients who had isolated adenoid hypertrophy * patients' hemoglobin levels above 10 mg/dl Exclusion Criteria: * those with recent upper respiratory tract infections, evidence of bleeding disorders, serous otitis media, chronic tonsillitis * those advised against undergoing adenoidectomy after consulting a phoniatrist * patients with atrophic rhinitis those with nasal obstruction caused by other nasal or paranasal conditions such as inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Choanal atresia, deviated nasal septum, antrochoanal polyps, and other causes of nasal obstruction in children.

What they're measuring

Operative duration

Timeframe: During the procedure

Intraopertive blood loss

Timeframe: during the procedures

Postopertaive Pain

Timeframe: Patients reported their pain levels every day before taking any pain medication during the 7 days after their surgery

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06841432

SponsorAl-Azhar University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-01-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Adenoid Hypertrophy trials