Dementia and mild cognitive impairment are a rising concern for the ageing population in Singapore, leading to diminished quality of life and health outcomes. Arts-based interventions in a museum setting have been shown to improve cognitive health and well-being for Persons with Cognitive Impairment (PWCIs), however little is known about the relationship of heritage-based interventions on the health and well-being of PWCIs. This mixed-methods study evaluates the 6-week "Refresh and Reconnect!" programme (R\&R!), a museum-based heritage programme including guided artist-led activities and tours of the National Museum of Singapore. (i) In the quantitative study (n = 64-120 PWCIs, comprising with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia), assessments will be conducted at 2 time points (pre-programme, post-programme) to evaluate change in cognitive, social, and mental well-being. ii) In the qualitative study, ethnographic observations of the R\&R! programme; ethnographic interviews with staff (n= max 3), \& artists (n= max 6); and in-depth interviews with PWCIs (n=16) will be used to elicit the underlying context-mechanisms-outcomes which enable R\&R! success. Programme volunteers will also be engaged through casual or informal conversations as part of the ethnographic observations. The study will provide valuable insights for the development of effective, non-pharmacological interventions for PWCIs. The primary objectives of the study are to (a) compare the change (before and after programme participation) in the health and well-being of PWCIs participating in the programme, and (b) assess the change (before and after programme participation) in the perception of the museum, 'heritage' and learning among PWCIs participating in the programme. The secondary aims are to understand the factors, contexts, and mechanisms that influence the implementation of the museum-based intervention and its effects, including the place-based effects of the curated museum Reunion space for PWCIs. Achieving the objectives will help answer the following research questions: 1. To what extent, and how does participation in the "Refresh and Reconnect!" programme impact health and well-being of PWCIs? 2. To what extent, and how does participation in the programme affect the study participants' understanding and perception of the museum as a potential place to enhance one's health and well-being? \[Note: Study Participants include all who are participating in the study such as PWCIs and those who are implementing (e.g. museum staff), facilitating (e.g. artists) and assisting (e.g. volunteers) with the R\&R! Programme\] 3. What are the contexts and mechanisms that influence the implementation of the programme? These findings are of significant public health importance for Singapore, potentially informing policy decisions, resource allocation, and healthcare strategies to better support PWCIs, ultimately improving their quality of life. Findings of the study may also contribute to similar heritage-based programmes in future, contributing to the understanding of key elements of programme success, and for whom these programmes are effective for.
Age range
21 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change from baseline in Quality of life at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in Health-related Quality of life at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in depression at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in anxiety at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in loneliness at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in social isolation at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in ageing perceptions at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in motivations to learn at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks
Change from baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment score at the end of the 6-week intervention
Timeframe: From enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 weeks