Does Restriction of the Dominant Hand Due to Injury Improve Non-Dominant Hand Function? (NCT06783205) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Does Restriction of the Dominant Hand Due to Injury Improve Non-Dominant Hand Function?
Turkey (Türkiye)40 participantsStarted 2024-04-06
Plain-language summary
Hand injuries result in the restriction of use of the injured hand within a splint or a plaster during the first 6 weeks which is critical for tissue healing. When the dominant hand is injured, patients experience more difficulty in daily life due to this restriction. Patients injured on their dominant hand mostly express that they are forced to use their non-dominant hand in their activities and as a result, the function of the non-dominant hand improves. However, the non-dominant hand function has not been analyzed in patients with restricted use of the dominant hand during the tissue healing period.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Individuals who need to use a splint for 6 weeks due to any pathology in their dominant hand
* Ages between 18-65
* Individuals who are within the first 10 days after the operation
Exclusion Criteria:
* Individuals with an isolated thumb injury
* Those who require bilateral use of the splint/have bilateral pathology
* Those who have a condition that prevents the use of the non-dominant hand
* Those who can use both hands equally/do not have a dominant side (ambidextrous/two-handed)
* Those who have a cooperative status that will not comply with the treatment program
* Data from individuals who do not use the splint as described during the 6-week follow-up period will not be included in the analysis.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.