Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in industrialized countries, including France, with over 60,000 new cases each year, and represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death in men. The only known risk factors are age, ethnic origin and family history of prostate cancer. Indeed, there are considerable ethnic disparities in prostate cancer risk, with an incidence rate 60% higher in African-American men than in European-American men (Evans 2008). Similarly, in the French West Indies, where over 90% of the population is of Afro-Caribbean origin, the incidence of prostate cancer is twice as high as in mainland France. In 2015, the annual incidence was 88.5 cases per 100,000 in mainland France (Defossez 2021), while it was 184.1 cases per 100,000 in Guadeloupe, over the period 2008-2013 (Desloumeaux 2017), and 161.1 cases per 100,000 in Martinique, over the period 2005-2014 (Joachim 2019). The incidence rates observed in the French West Indies are of the same order as those observed in Afro-Caribbean populations in the UK and African-American populations in the USA (Ben Schlomo 2008, Evans 2008). The reasons for these ethnic disparities in incidence are still poorly understood, but the role of genetic factors has been suggested. Indeed, certain genetic polymorphisms have been associated with an increased individual risk of prostate cancer in men of sub-Saharan African origin (Conti 2021; Karunamuni 2021; Marlin 2021). In addition, certain environmental factors (in the broadest sense) such as obesity, chronic inflammation, diet and certain environmental pollutants, including persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as certain organochlorine pesticides, are also strongly suspected. Among the suspected organochlorine pesticides is chlordecone, an insecticide used in the French West Indies until 1993, strongly suspected of playing a role in the occurrence of prostate cancer, particularly in the West Indies. Indeed, the Kannari study (Dereumeaux and Saoudi 2018), supported by Santé publique France, assessed the exposure of the West Indian population (Martinique and Guadeloupe) in 2013-2014 to chlordecone and certain organochlorine compounds , measured by serum levels, and quantified the determinants of this impregnation. The results of the study show that 90% of the West Indian population is indeed exposed to chlordecone, and demonstrate that chlordecone is still present in the environment (water and soil) and in food products, despite the cessation of its use in the West Indies in 1993. To date, only one epidemiological study has explored the link between chlordecone exposure and the occurrence of prostate cancer, the Karuprostate study, a case-control study carried out between 2004 and 2007 in Guadeloupe, including 623 prostate cancer cases and 671 controls (Multigner 2010). Chlordecone exposure was measured by serum levels with an initial detection limit of 0.25 μg/L (Multigner 2010), then improved to 0.06 μg/L (Emmeville 2015). The authors highlighted a significant association between chlordecone exposure and prostate cancer, with a positive dose-response relationship (OR=1.77; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.58 for the highest tercile). This association was more specifically observed in subjects with a family history of prostate cancer and in men who had lived in a Western country, requiring further investigation. The Karuprostate study also showed that serum levels of dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), the main and most stable metabolite of DDT, were significantly associated with the occurrence of CaP (Emmeville 2015). These results underline the interest of assessing, along with chlordecone, co-exposure to other persistent organic or organochlorine pollutants. Furthermore, DDE exhibits anti-androgenic effects and has been shown to repress the production of Prostatic-Specific Antigen (PSA) (target gene of the androgen receptor) by human prostate cancer cell lines (Wong 2015). The supposed effect of other organochlorines such as chlordecone on androgen receptors and thus on PSA levels could thus have important repercussions in terms of prostate cancer diagnosis. Individual screening for prostate cancer is based on serum PSA levels, followed in cases of elevated PSA (\> 3-4 ng/ml) by multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). A recent study showed that performing pre-biopsy mpMRI, regardless of PSA level, could lead to more men being diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (Eldred-Evans 2021). Finally, there is a lack of preclinical studies to investigate the distribution of chlordecone in blood and tissues, as well as the link between chlordecone and markers of prostate cancer aggressiveness. We therefore propose a case-control study in the general population of Martinique. This study will enable us to understand the nature of the link between chlordecone and prostate cancer.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Primary Outcome Measure : Measure of association between chlordecone exposure and the risk of prostate cancer.
Timeframe: The blood sample required for chlordecone measurement and the study questionnaire will be taken for each participant during the single inclusion visit. Analysis of the study outcomes will take place at the end of the 36 months recruitment phase.