CompletedNot Applicable

Bowel Dysfunction After Low Rectal Resection. An Pilot Study Using Psyllium Husk In Rectal Cancer Patients.

Norway24 participantsStarted 2025-01-01

Plain-language summary

Rectal cancer constitutes 1/3 of more than 4500 annually diagnosed cases of colorectal (CRC) in Norway. With the advances in radiochemotherapy, and surgical techniques, the long-term survival rate is increasing after surgery regardless of the rising incidences, with a 73% 5-year survival rate in Norway (89% for stage I-III cancer). Low anterior resection (LAR) is the most commonly performed surgical procedure with curative intent with over 500 procedures per year in Norway alone. 80 % of patients subjected to LAR suffer from the LAR syndrome (LARS) which includes grades of bowel incontinence, urgency and tenesmus contributing to reduced quality of life (QoL). Suggested means of management have been advocated without preceding randomized trials. Psyllium husk has been suggested as a nutritional supplement for symptom reduction in patients suffering from LARS, but data is limited and no larger, randomized studies regarding its effect on patients with low anterior resection syndrome have been conducted. In this pilot study preceeding a placebo-controlled RCT, the investigators aim to improve documentation of a proposed management strategy. The investigators anticipate that a reduction in intestinal symptomburden will increase QoL for this large patientgroup.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Operated with low rectal resection for rectal cancer * LARS score \>20 at 12 months or more after surgery * Written consent Exclusion Criteria: * Various conditions rendering the patient unable to answer questionnaire * LARS score 0-20 * Contraindications to Psyllium husk (hypersensitivity, intestinal obstruction, reduced esophageal function, rare congenital medical conditions such as sucrase-isomaltase deficiency, fructose intolerance and glucose-galactose malabsorbtion)

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

LARS score

Timeframe: At baseline, at 4 and 8 weeks of intervention

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06724198

SponsorSykehuset Telemark

Sponsor typeOTHER_GOV

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-07-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Low Anterior Resection Syndrome trials