Emory Spiritual Health has developed a Compassion-Centered Spiritual Health group-based intervention, called CCSH Interventions for Teams, and are enrolling staff and providers into the groups in this randomized study design. The groups will meet once every other week for 60 minutes for 8 weeks (4 sessions total). The investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this novel team-based intervention that includes mindfulness and compassion-based approaches with mixed-role oncology teams. Employees (n = 80; nurses, advanced practice providers (APPs), physicians, staff) working at an NCI- designated Comprehensive Cancer Center will be randomized by team (8-12 employees/group) to Compassion Centered Spiritual Health Team Intervention (CCSH-TI) or TAU (Treatment as Usual) group. The research objective is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CCSH-TI, and to develop and validate a novel, low-burden ambulatory assessment "toolkit" to improve the measurement of psychological safety and burnout.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Proportion of eligible employees who enroll and are willing to be randomized
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of participants that attended and completed the three assessment timepoints
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Retention rates at three assessment timepoints
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Satisfaction score
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Perceived credibility score
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Perceived intervention benefit
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Acceptability of wearing the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR)
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Number of EMA dropouts
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)
Percentage (%) of items completed using EMA
Timeframe: BaselineI (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 12-weeks post-intervention (LT)