The purpose of this study is to assess impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)+Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) vs. sham rTMS+EFT on delay discounting and methamphetamine (MA) demand, on vividness of future positive events during EFT training and on frequency of episodic thinking during the week following EFT training
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Rate of delay discounting as assessed by the 5-Trial adjusting Delay Discounting Task
Timeframe: before TMS+EFT, after TMS+EFT, 7-day follow-up
Change in MA Demand as assessed by the Drug Purchasing Task
Timeframe: before TMS+EFT, after TMS+EFT, 7-day follow-up
EFT Vividness as assessed by the Vividness Scale
Timeframe: measured during EFT training on study day 1
EFT Engagement as assessed by the Engagement Scale
Timeframe: 7-day follow-up