Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable

Urethral Mobilisation Versus Mathieu Technique for Repair of Distal Hypospadias

60 participantsStarted 2024-11-25

Plain-language summary

The aim of this research is to compare the surgical outcomes of urethral mobilization and the Mathieu technique in treating distal penile hypospadias. The study will evaluate complication rates such as fistula formation and meatal stenosis, assess functional outcomes related to urinary stream quality, and analyze cosmetic results including the appearance of the neomeatus. Ultimately, the goal is to provide evidence-based guidance for choosing the most appropriate technique to optimize surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Who can participate

Age range6 Months – 7 Years

SexMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria:• Male patients aged 6 months to 7 years. * Diagnosed with distal penile hypospadias (coronal, or subcoronal types). * Mild to no chordee present (curvature \<30°). * No associated with severe genital anomalies. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with proximal hypospadias (midshaft, penoscrotal, or perineal). * Presence of significant chordee requiring separate corrective procedures. * Hypoplastic or poorly developed urethral plate that is unsuitable for surgical repair. * Previous hypospadias repair surgery. * Patients with severe comorbidities or conditions that could increase the risk of surgery (e.g., severe cardiac anomalies).

What they're measuring

urethrocutaneous fistula

Timeframe: 1 month

meatal stenosis

Timeframe: 2 months

wound infection

Timeframe: 1 week

hematoma

Timeframe: 3 days

neomeatus retraction

Timeframe: 3 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06705699

SponsorAssiut University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2027-11-01

Contact for this trial

Mohamed abdelhamid, specialist

00201004663936 mohamed.abdelhameed1@med.aun.edu.eg