The goal of this observational study is to compare the predictive utility of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score in determining outcomes among patients with altered mental status admitted to the emergency room. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the FOUR Score provide a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes than the GCS Score? Are there specific patient subgroups where one score is more effective than the other? Participants will: Undergo assessment of mental status using both the FOUR Score and the GCS Score during their emergency room admission. Have their clinical outcomes monitored during their hospital stay.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
In hospital mortality
Timeframe: average of 10 days through discharge
Accuracy Assessment of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Timeframe: the first 12 hours after ER admission
Accuracy Assessment of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score
Timeframe: the first 12 hours after ER admission