Today, with increasing aesthetic demands; the need for materials that are both durable and compatible with the appearance of natural teeth is increasing in paediatric dentistry. Prefabricated zirconium crowns have attracted significant interest in recent years because they meet aesthetic expectations and have offer mechanical strength. There are various traditional and contemporary cement options that can be used for cementation of crowns. The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented to the primary maxillary incisors with three different adhesive cements in terms of periodantal health, plaque accumulation, opposing tooth wear, parental satisfaction, color harmony, retention, marginal integrity and contact compatibility, at the 1-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month follow-ups.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Change in clinical performance.
Timeframe: 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in periodontal health (Plaque)
Timeframe: 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Wear of opposing natural teeth
Timeframe: 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Measuring of parental satisfaction
Timeframe: 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in periodontal health (Gingiva)
Timeframe: 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months