By InvitationNot Applicable

Minimal Vitrectomy and ILM Flap with Sodium Hyaluronate Gel for MH

China52 participantsStarted 2024-11-01

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the prognostic validity of two different surgical approaches: minimal posterior pole vitrectomy combined with a sodium hyaluronate gel-covered internal limiting membrane(ILM) flap with balanced saline filling and postoperative supine position, versus conventional vitrectomy combined with ILM flap flap coverage with sterile air filling and postoperative prone position. The main question it aims to answer is: Whether patients with macular hole have the same or even better prognosis with minimal posterior pole vitrectomy combined with sodium hyaluronate gel covered flip ILM flap accompanied by balanced salt solution filling accompanied by postoperative supine position than with conventional macular hole surgery. Participants will: The control group undergoes conventional vitrectomy combined with internal limbal flap coverage accompanied by sterile air filling of the vitreous cavity and three days of postoperative surgery in strict supine position. The study group undergoes minimal posterior pole vitrectomy combined with sodium hyaluronate gel-assisted flap of the inner border membrane accompanied by 24 hours of postoperative surgical treatment in a non-strict supine position. Participants of this study come to Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital for follow-up examinations at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in the 23rd clinic of the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital for review of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography angiography, microfluidic field of view (at 6 months postoperatively), and slit-lamp examination.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients diagnosed with idiopathic macular hole and 250 μm ≤ aperture size ≤ 800 μm, with clinical diagnosis based on visual acuity testing, fundus photography, and swept optical coherence tomography/optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCT/OCTA) * Age ≥18 years, gender not restricted * 22 mm ≤ eye axis ≤ 26 mm * Patients who can cooperate with accurate microperimetry testing * Individuals who are able to follow up at the time specified by the researcher Exclusion Criteria: * Coexisting active eyelid or appendage infections * Coexisting ocular pathology other than cataract that affects vision (e.g., retinal detachment or proliferative vitreoretinopathy; diabetic retinopathy; retinal vascular occlusion; uveitis; ocular tumors; glaucoma) * patients who refused to be randomized * Other relevant medical history such as cranial brain disease, systemic immune system disease, etc. * Those who have received medical or surgical treatment other than myopia and cataract in the study eye within the previous 12 months * Other patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, should be excluded.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

postoperative best corrected visual acuity

Timeframe: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after surgery

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06685328

SponsorJie Zhong

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-06-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Macular Hole trials