Cognition, Metacognition, and Stigma in Patients With Suicidal Ideation (NCT06652815) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Cognition, Metacognition, and Stigma in Patients With Suicidal Ideation
220 participantsStarted 2026-12-01
Plain-language summary
Deficits of executive function, meta cognition and stigma is known in suicidal ideation; however, their relationship is unknown. Since many studies use a single indicator of executive function and, it was considered important to study. Metacognition, executive functioning and stigma are the possible driving force behind the suicidal behavior in human being. With respect to research in the Indian context, there is paucity of studies exploring these factors. The purpose of the present study is to explore the relationships between executive functioning, metacognition, and stigma in suicidal ideation and suicide attempters in the Indian setup, where there is a lacuna in research regarding the same. Having a detailed understanding of these psychological parameters will be helpful in suicide prevention and management.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Any gender
* Age between 18 to 60 years.
* Able to read and write in Hindi and English
* With a primary mental health diagnosis of anxiety, depression, acute stress reaction or adjustment disorder, or with no diagnosis at all
* Persons with high suicidal ideation (Score 2 or more in first five items of BSSI)
* Person who attempted suicide in last three months.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Any comorbid personality disorder diagnosis
* Diagnosis of a major mental disorder such as Schizophrenia or Bipolar Affective Disorder.
* Intellectual Disability and neurological disorder.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Metacognition measured by Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-3) scores