Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

Turkey (Türkiye)70 participantsStarted 2024-09-01

Plain-language summary

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 65 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery Exclusion criteria Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance \< 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance \< 6 cm

What they're measuring

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

Timeframe: 3 months

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

Timeframe: 3 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06649526

SponsorDr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER_GOV

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2024-11-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Anesthesia trials