Background: In emergency situations in mountainous regions, medical professionals are often required to perform advanced medical procedures swiftly and efficiently. The choice of procedure and the environmental conditions can significantly impact the patient outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of three advanced emergency medical procedures in a simulated scenario: orotracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscopy, minithoracotomy, and front of neck access, under both normal and cold temperature conditions. Methods: On 16 and 17 October 2023, members of the Medical Commission of the International Commission for Alpine Rescue performed a simulation training in an extreme environmental simulation chamber (terraXcube) in Bolzano, Italy. During this, each participant will perform three advanced medical procedures, once under normal environmental conditions (+20°C) and once under cold temperature conditions (-20°C), in randomized order and with a crossover design. Specifically, the three advanced medical procedures consist of 1) simulation of a difficult orotracheal intubation on a dedicated mannikin with a videolaryngoscope; 2) front of neck access (FONA) with the scalpel-finger-bougie technique on a dedicated mannikin model; 3) minithoracotomy and chest tube placement on a dedicated mannikin model. Outcomes: Primary outcome: The primary outcome is the difference in time required for three different advanced medical procedures, i.e. orotracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscopy, minithoracotomy, and front of neck access, under normal environmental conditions (+20°C) compared to cold temperature (-20°C). Secondary outcomes: Secondary outcomes include the success rate for three different advanced medical procedures, i.e. orotracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscopy, minithoracotomy, and front of neck access, under normal environmental conditions (+20°C) compared to cold temperature (-20°C). Moreover, the subjective difficulty of performing the procedures, stress levels, emotional regualtion and decision-making process will be assessed through a questionnaire.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Difference in Time to perform the procedure
Timeframe: During the performance of the procedure