RecruitingNot Applicable

Prospective Follow-up of the Prevision Hip Stem With Comparison of Different Implant Variants

Germany, United Kingdom120 participantsStarted 2026-04-07

Plain-language summary

The study design is confirmative for non-inferiority of the functional outcome of the implants and is intended to examine the safety and performance of the Prevision hip stem. The study is an observational post-market clinical follow-up study, and the study sites chose the stem variant depending on their own routine and indication.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Revision hip arthroplasty patients treated with a Prevision hip stem * Written patient informed consent * Patients are able to attend at follow-up examinations Exclusion Criteria: * Patients \< 18 years at surgery * Pregnancy at implantation * Patients held in a custodial setting * Patients in a relationship of dependence on the sponsor, the clinic or the investigator

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Functional outcome of the hip revision surgery

Timeframe: after two years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06626490

SponsorAesculap AG

Sponsor typeINDUSTRY

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2033-03

Contact for this trial

Kerstin Bergmann

+49746195- studies@aesculap.de

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty trials