CompletedNot Applicable

Prediction of MMSE Scores for Cognitive Impairment

Sweden693 participantsStarted 2024-06-10

Plain-language summary

This study aims to explore the potential of using machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict cognitive status, specifically MMSE scores, based on oral health and demographic data. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of various ML models and identify the most relevant oral health indicators for predicting MMSE scores of 30 (normal cognition) or ≤26 (cognitive impairment) in individuals aged 60 and above.

Who can participate

Age range

60 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Individuals aged 60 years or older. * Participants with recorded oral health parameters and MMSE scores of either 30 or ≤26. Exclusion Criteria: * Individuals with MMSE scores of 27, 28, or 29, as these scores represent a transition phase between normal cognition and cognitive impairment, which could introduce variability. * Individuals younger than 60 years.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Detection perfomance

Timeframe: 5 mounths

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06611475

SponsorBlekinge Institute of Technology

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2024-10-10

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Cognitive Impairment trials