Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Since the publication of IBCSG23-01, ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS study, these studies indicated that there was no significant difference in recurrence and overall survival rates between the ALNB and SLNB+ALND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, an adaptation of the strategy to omit axillary lymph node dissection in patients with low-risk axillary involvement who are treated with curative surgery and systematic therapy. However, they also pose new challenges for adjuvant radiotherapy decisions. In the Z0011 study, patients were required to receive breast tangent field radiotherapy. In the AMAROS study, axillary radiotherapy included level I-III axillary lymph node drainage areas and the supraclavicular area, but the study results showed a local recurrence rate of only 1.19% at 5 years in the axillary radiotherapy group. Consequently, there is considerable controversy among clinical experts about whether a combined regional lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy strategy is necessary for low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients. In contrast, results from the EORTC-22922 and MA-20 studies, which included patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, showed that adjuvant radiotherapy to the entire lymphatic drainage area, including the internal mammary region, reduced the risk of disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, the adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for early breast cancer patients with low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis remains controversial, with a lack of high-level evidence to support it.
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Percentage of patients with arm lymphedema
Timeframe: 2 year