Outcomes of PFA Vs. RFA for Patients with PSVT: a Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Study (NCT06573853) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Outcomes of PFA Vs. RFA for Patients with PSVT: a Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Study
China428 participantsStarted 2022-10-11
Plain-language summary
The goal of this retrospective study is to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of pulses field ablation (PFA) Vs. radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The main question to answer is:
Does the PFA was more effecient and safer that RFA for treatment of PSVT during procedure and after 1-year follow-up? Researchers will compare the acute and long-term efficiency and safety between PFA and RFA.
1. Recieved PFA or RFA 1 year ago
2. Finish the visit to the clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12 months for examinations and blood testings
3. Patients recieved PFA and PFA under propensity matched comparison according to differen variety of PSVT
Who can participate
Age range18 Years β 80 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.