RecruitingNot Applicable

EEAP Using Moses 2.0 Technology vs the Thulium Fiber Laser in Medium-Large Prostates

Spain120 participantsStarted 2024-09-03

Plain-language summary

Introduction: Endoscopic anatomical enucleation of the prostate (EEAP) with lasers has emerged as an effective and less invasive surgical option compared to traditional methods. Among the various available laser options, Holmium laser and Thulium Fiber laser have stood out as two prominent approaches for performing endoscopic prostate enucleation. These technologies have 3 showcased their effectiveness in ablating prostatic tissue and improving urinary symptoms. Nevertheless, differences in their physical properties and modes of action may impact their success rates and clinical outcomes. In our institution it is standard practice to use one laser or the other according to their availability in the operating room. Primary Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of MoLEP over ThuFLEP in terms of enucleation efficiency. Secondary Objectives: a) To demonstrate the non-inferiority of MoLEP compared to ThuFLEP in terms of perioperative bleeding. b) To demonstrate the non-inferiority of MoLEP compared to ThuFLEP in terms of postoperative hospital stay. c) To demonstrate the non-inferiority of ThuFLEP compared to ThuFLEP in terms of perioperative complications. d) To demonstrate the non-inferiority of MoLEP compared to ThuFLEP in terms of improvement in urinary symptoms. e) To demonstrate the non-inferiority of MoLEP compared to ThuFLEP in terms of improvement in flowmetric variables. Study Type: Prospective, randomized, non-blind, multicentric clinical trial. Intervention: Patients with an indication for surgery for BPH via EEAP with a prostate volume exceeding 80cc will be included in the study on a prospective basis. Surgery will be randomly assigned using MoLEP or ThuFLEP. A qualified surgeon, having completed their learning curve for endoscopic enucleation (more than 50 cases) and possessing experience with both laser types, will perform the surgical procedure.

Who can participate

Age range

40 Years – 90 Years

Sex

MALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Males aged between 40 and 90 years. * Patients who, due to their lower urinary tract symptoms, are candidates for BPH surgery, including: * Obstructive urinary symptoms evaluated through IPSS with a score \>7 and QoL \> 2 or acute urinary reten on refractory to catheter removal. * Obstructive urinary flow evaluated through uroflowmetry with Qmax\< 15 ml/s, obstruction demonstrated by pressure/flow study, prostatic origin haematuria refractory to medical treatment, or acute urinary retention refractory to catheter removal. * Prostatic volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound, transrectal ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging of more than 80 cc. * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \< 4 ng/ml, or with multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging reporting PIRADS \< 3 or equal to 3 with PSA density \< 15%. Exclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis, suspicion, or history of urethral stenosis or urethral surgery. * History of prostate surgery or pelvic radiotherapy. * Diagnosis or suspicion of prostate cancer or urothelial cancer. * Body mass index superior to 30.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

SURGICAL TIME

Timeframe: Total time of Surgery procedure

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06565741

SponsorFundacio Puigvert

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2028-09

Contact for this trial

Ivan Schwartzmann Jochamowitz, MD

0034934169700 ischwartzm@fundacio-puigvert.es

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Prostatic Hyperplasia trials