Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Dexketoprofen Trometamol, Meperidine, and Paracetamol in … (NCT06558916) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 4
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Dexketoprofen Trometamol, Meperidine, and Paracetamol in Renal Colic
90 participantsStarted 2015-10
Plain-language summary
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) dexketoprofen trometamol, IV meperidine, and IV paracetamol as analgesics for renal colic in patients at the Emergency Department of Erciyes University Medical School. The double-blind, randomized trial included 90 patients aged 18-65 years. Patients were divided into three groups of 30, receiving 50 mg IV dexketoprofen trometamol, 50 mg IV meperidine, or 1000 mg IV paracetamol, administered in 250 mL of saline over 15 minutes. Pain intensity was measured at 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-administration using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Successful treatment was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in VAS score at 30 minutes. Patients with a VAS score of 40 mm or higher at the 30th minute were given fentanyl (1 mcg/kg, intravenously) as a rescue drug.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adults aged 18 to 65.
* Diagnosed with renal colic via anamnesis, physical examination, laboratory, and imaging tests.
* Provided informed consent to participate in the research.
* Both genders.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Recent intake of any analgesic medication within six hours prior to arrival.
* Regular medication schedule.
* Age under 18 or over 65.
* Hemodynamically unstable patients.
* Renal, hepatic, cardiac, or respiratory failure.
* Allergies to study drugs.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* History of renal transplantation.
* Presence of only one kidney.
* Serum creatinine levels exceeding 2 mg/dL.
* History of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer.
* Inability to complete the pain scale due to vision problems.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.