RecruitingNot Applicable

Evaluation of the Propensity of Patients Under rhGH to Envision a Modification of Their Treatment Regimen Toward LAGH

Belgium500 participantsStarted 2024-04-15

Plain-language summary

Daily subcutaneous injections of rhGH can be burdensome for patients, leading to poor adherence and reduced growth outcomes. This has spurred the development of long-acting GH (LAGH) analogues that allow for weekly, biweekly, or monthly injections. Previous studies on LAGH analogues have demonstrated their non-inferiority compared to daily rhGH in terms of increasing growth velocity and improving body composition in children and adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), respectively, without significant and unexpected adverse events. Since 2020, three molecules have received approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of pediatric GHD: lonapegsomatropin, somatrogon, and somapacitan. These LAGH analogues may offer better patient acceptance, improved tolerance, and greater therapeutic flexibility. However, these LAGH analogues could also be associated with potential clinical issues in terms of therapeutic monitoring, incidence and duration of side effects, and long-term safety due to a non-physiological GH profile. The introduction of these new LAGH products will require clinicians to identify optimal candidates for LAGH therapy and gain knowledge on monitoring and adjusting treatment.

Who can participate

Age range

1 Day – 18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Belgian and Luxembourgish patients currently under rhGh treatment in its various official indications (as per the Belgian RIZIV/INAMI monitor : growth hormone deficiency, Turner Syndrome, chronic renal insufficiency, Prader-Willi syndrome, Small for gestational age, Noonan Syndrome, SHOX gene deficiency) and included in the BELGROW Registry * Male -female * 0-18 years * Free written or e-consent and oral consent Exclusion Criteria: * No exclusion criteria

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Evaluate families and patients propensity with a questionnaire to envision a switch from rhGH treatment to LAGH

Timeframe: Baseline

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06542809

SponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-03-01

Contact for this trial

Philippe Lysy, MD, PhD

027641370 philippe.lysy@saintluc.uclouvain.be

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Growth Hormone Deficiency trials