Atrial Anomalies Predict Silent Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Cr… (NCT06542770) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Atrial Anomalies Predict Silent Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Cryptogenic Stroke
Spain100 participantsStarted 2021-01-01
Plain-language summary
Cryptogenic stroke (CS) causes about 30% of admissions to a stroke unit. Silent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is believed to be the underlying cause of a significant proportion of patients. The use of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) early after the CS has demonstrated benefits in the diagnostic yield, but the indication for ICM in the current guidelines remains unclear. Atrial contraction strain (ACS) evaluated by cardiac ultrasound could be of help to select the patients more prone to suffer from silent PAF.
The purpose of this investigation is to conduct a randomized prospective unicentric study to evaluate the usefulness of ICM for early detection of silent PAF episodes in patients with CS. Clinical and ultrasound predictors of PAF occurrence (ACS) will be studied in order to define patients needing a closer follow-up.
Who can participate
Age range
50 Years – 89 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Absence of major structural heart disease by cardiac ultrasound (normal global and segmental left ventricle contraction, absence of valvular/rheumatic disease, absence of intracardiac shunts)
. Absence of AF during 48h ECG-monitoring
. Absence of major anomalies in the supra-aortic trunks ultrasound.
Exclusion criteria
. Patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke;
. Presence with prior atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter;
. Permanent contraindication or indication for OAC for other reasons;
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Detection atrial fibrilation at follow-up
Timeframe: Up to 2 years follow-up (ICM and standard care practice)