CPVI With Modified Linear Ablation Versus CPVI in Patients With Long-standing Persistent Atrial F… (NCT06516822) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
CPVI With Modified Linear Ablation Versus CPVI in Patients With Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (SINUS)
China320 participantsStarted 2024-07-31
Plain-language summary
Catheter ablation has become as the first-line treatment for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). As the cornerstone of catheter ablation for AF, the safety and efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) have been confirmed. However, for persistent AF, especially for long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF), the recurrence rate is still high. Whether the ethanol infusion (EI) into the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) and linear ablation could improve the success rate remains controversial.
The SINUS study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, which is designed to compare the efficacy and safety between CPVI with modified linear ablation (CPVI-MLA) and CPVI only for the treatment of LSPAF.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. 1\. Patients with symptomatic LSPAF refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug; LSPAF will be defined as a sustained AF episode lasting ≥ 1 year;
. AF duration 1-3 years;
. Age 18 - 75 years;
. Left atrial diameter (LAD) 43-55 mm on long axis parasternal view;
. AF recorded within 3 years of enrollment;
. Patient willing and able to comply with protocol and sign informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia off AADs
Timeframe: 12 months
Trial details
NCT IDNCT06516822
SponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University