This is a quasi-experimental longitudinal study to compare the outcomes of youth in a Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facility (PRTF) compared to youth in the community-based Child-Focused Assertive Community Treatment Team \[Child ACTT\] program. The hypothesis is that Child ACTT will be associated with better outcomes and lower cost than PRTF among adolescents admitted to Child ACTT or PRTF.
Age range
12 Years – 18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Average Z-score From Participant Self Report on Domains in the Clinical Scale of the Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) at Study Intervention Endpoint
Timeframe: Study intervention endpoint (discharge or 6 months)
Average Z-score From Participant Self Report on Domains in the Clinical Scale of the Treatment Outcome Package (TOP-CS) at Post-discharge Follow-up
Timeframe: Completed follow-up within 28 days to 6 months from discharge date during 6- month study intervention