Objectives: (1) To analyse the benefits of Komtü Programme implementation in children's and teachers' well-being (primary outcomes); (2) to analyse the benefits of Komtü Programme implementation in teacher's assertiveness, mentalization and self-efficacy (secondary outcomes). (3) and to analyse the benefits of Komtü Programme implementation according to children's prosocial behaviour, self-esteem and mentalization (secondary outcomes). Participants: Teachers will be placed in one of the 3 groups, according to the school's support needs they work at. In this case, randomization would not be possible in the allocation process. In one of the interventions, the participants will receive the planned actions for the first school year of the Komtü Programme. In the other intervention, the participants will only receive the training and the reflective practice planned for the Komtü. The last group will complete the school year as usual (TAU, control group). Comparisons: Researchers will compare all 3 groups among them to see to what extent: * Komtü Programme shows efficacy in fostering children's well-being compared with the training and TAU (control group). * Komtü Programme shows efficacy in fostering teachers' well-being compared with the training and TAU (control group). * Training and reflective practice shows efficacy in fostering children's well-being compared with TAU (control group). * Training and reflective practice shows efficacy in fostering teachers' well-being compared with TAU (control group). And as for the secondary outcomes, researchers will also compare all 3 group to observe possible inter-group differences.
Age range
9 Years – 67 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Stirling Children's Well-Being Scale (SCWB)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 8 months
Child Well-being Level (CWBL)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 8 months
Child Well-being Level - Teacher's version (CWBL-T)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 8 months
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 8 months
Teacher's Subjective Well-being Scale (TSWBS)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 8 months