CompletedNot Applicable

Is HugeMed Video Laryngoscope Superior to McGrath in Pediatric Patients

Turkey (Türkiye)40 participantsStarted 2022-03-01

Plain-language summary

Videolaryngoscopes improve laryngeal visualization in children under 3 years. In this study we aimed to compare Hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscopes regarding their Cormach-Lehane (CL) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores. Furthermore, tracheal intubation success rates, need for cricoid pressure and optimization maneuvers, and hemodynamic changes are compared.

Who can participate

Age range6 Months – 3 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: total of 40 elective surgical patients under the age of 3, classified as ASA 1-3 risk group, who underwent general anesthesia with no anticipated difficult airway. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who could not obtain parental consent, those classified as ASA 4 and above, individuals with serious cardiac and respiratory problems, and patients anticipated to have a difficult airway were not included in the study.

What they're measuring

Success of intubation

Timeframe: Procedure (At the time of the intubation of the patient.)

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06484517

SponsorMarmara University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-10-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Difficult Intubation trials