CompletedNot Applicable

The Impact of the Anaesthetic Technique Employed on the Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy Surgery.

Turkey (Türkiye)84 participantsStarted 2024-04-01

Plain-language summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the results of different anesthesia methods (general anesthesia with epidural catheter application and spinal anesthesia with epidural catheter application) applied in elective hysterectomy surgeries performed in our hospital. The aim is to compare the advantages of both methods.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 65 Years

SexFEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy * Patients with The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class1-2-3 * Those who are literate enough to answer the compilation quality of recovery score (QoR-15) questionnaire Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with contraindications for neuraxial anesthesia * Patients with The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score above 3 * The presence of another malignant neoplasm, other than the indication for hysterectomy, * Patients with substance abuse disorders, including alcohol and drug addiction * Patients who do not consent to or desire to be included in the study.

What they're measuring

The Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score in the first 24 hours after surgery

Timeframe: postoperative 24 hours

A comparison of the difference in recovery quality scores between patients at the preoperative and postoperative 24th hour.

Timeframe: postoperative 24 hours

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06461832

SponsorSamsun University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2025-02-24

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Anesthesia trials