Aim: This randomized controlled clinical study aimed to compare direct composite resin restorations and Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) supported inlay or onlay restorations in young permanent molar teeth with hypomineralization. The main questions aim to answer are: * The clinical success rate of CAD-CAM supported restorations * The highest clinical success rate for restoring hypomineralized teeth. Materials and method: Children aged 6-14 years old without any systemic conditions with 32 first and second hypomineralized permanent molar teeth were included in the study. Patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups as direct composite resin restorations and CAD-CAM supported inlay or onlay restorations. All restored teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically for 24-months. Statistical significance was accepted as p\<0.05.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria- Anatomic form)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Surface roughness)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Marginal adaptation)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Marginal discoloration)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Retention)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Color stability)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Secondary caries)
Timeframe: 24 months
Clinical evaluation (Modified USPHS criteria-Proximal contact)
Timeframe: 24 months
Radiographical evaluation (Lamina dura)
Timeframe: 24 months
Radiographical evaluation (Change in inter-root trabeculation continuity)
Timeframe: 24 months
Radiographical evaluation (Radiolucent area development)
Timeframe: 24 months