CompletedNot Applicable

Cross-Education for Chronic Ankle Instability

United States30 participantsStarted 2019-05-08

Plain-language summary

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) results in neuromuscular impairments compromising balance, lumbopelvic stability, and hip strength. Balance training has proven to be an effective intervention for individuals with CAI. Additionally, unilateral balance training for those with CAI has previously led to cross-education effects in which the untrained limb exhibited improved balance performance. However, the ability of unilateral balance training to improve contralateral hip strength and lumbopelvic stability in those with CAI is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the cross-education effects of balance training on hip strength and lumbopelvic stability in individuals with CAI. Thirty individuals with CAI will be randomized into control (CON) and balance (BAL) groups. Baseline testing include a unilateral hip bridge, hip strength, and balance tests of the uninvolved limb. For the unilateral hip bridge, the participant will hold a bridge through the test limb for maximum time. Isometric hip strength will be measured for external rotation (ER), extension (EXT), and abduction (ABD) using a handheld dynamometer. The star excursion balance test (SEBT) requires participants to maintain a single-leg stance while reaching for maximum distance with the opposite leg in three directions: anterior (SEBT-ANT), posterolateral (SEBT-PL), and posteromedial (SEBT-PM). The BAL group will participate in a progressive balance training program three times a week for eight weeks for the involved limb, whereas CON will not. All baseline measures will be reassessed at the end of the 8 weeks. Separate 2-way repeated measures ANOVAs will analyze the effects of group and time on each outcome. Additionally, each group's mean changes from baseline to post-intervention will be assessed with Cohen's d effect sizes. Statistical significance is set a priori at P\<0.05.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years – 40 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * All participants were required to have CAI based on guidelines published by the International Ankle Consortium. Participants were required to have a history of at least one acute LAS that resulted in swelling, pain, and at least one day of missed activity. The initial LAS must have occurred at least 12 months before study enrollment and the participants needed to be free of ankle sprains in the past three months. Participants were also required to report at least two events of "giving way" of their ankle, instability, or reinjury within the previous six months. Lastly, participants had to record scores of ≥5 on the Ankle Instability Instrument (AII), \>11 on the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI), and \<24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT).2 One member of the research team completed all screening procedures. The same person block randomized participants into two groups, control (CON) and balance training (BAL), by selecting a sealed envelope that contained group designation. Exclusion Criteria: * Participants were excluded if they had any history of lower extremity or spine fracture or surgery, any lower extremity or spine injury besides LAS within the past two years, and any significant ankle injury within the past three months.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Star Excursion Balance Test of the Uninvolved Limb

Timeframe: 10 minutes

Isometric hip strength of the Uninvolved Limb

Timeframe: 15 minutes

Lumbopelvic stability of the Uninvolved Limb

Timeframe: 2 minutes

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06401681

SponsorOld Dominion University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-05-24

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Balance Training Group trials