CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison Between Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases

Saudi Arabia28 participantsStarted 2021-08-01

Plain-language summary

Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the longevity of direct composite compared to indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases using USPHS criteria. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performance of direct composite and indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases over two years.

Who can participate

Age range20 Years – 35 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients needed diastema closure. * Patients with normal and full occlusion. * Patients must have a good oral hygiene. * Patients with a tooth respond positively to an electric pulp tester. Exclusion Criteria: * High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene. * Patients with periodontally-involved teeth. * Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching. * Patients involved in orthodontic treatment.

What they're measuring

Percentage % of patients with marginal staining

Timeframe: 2 years after restoration procedure

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06377423

SponsorPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2024-01-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Dental Leakage trials