Comparing the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique With Osseodensification for the Assessment of … (NCT06285903) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Comparing the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique With Osseodensification for the Assessment of Internal Sinus Iift-ing
Egypt20 participantsStarted 2022-09-02
Plain-language summary
Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant stability which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone sur-rounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain
Who can participate
Age range
35 Years – 39 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
free of systemic disease bone height at the site of the implant is ≤ 6 mm. have good oral hygiene.
\-
Exclusion Criteria:
systemic diseases active periodontal disease , limited mouth-opening ability maxillary sinus disease or previous sinus surgery were also excluded smokers pregnant
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1This trial compared two techniques for internal sinus lifting — hydrodynamic piezoelectric and osseodensification — so which of these two approaches does my doctor currently use or recommend for my situation, and why?
2Since this study measured implant stability as its main outcome using a device called Osstell, what stability score would my doctor consider acceptable before loading an implant, and how does that benchmark compare to what this trial found?
3The trial is listed as completed but the results may not yet be published — is my doctor aware of any findings from this study, and would those results change the technique they'd recommend for my sinus lift?
4Because this trial enrolled patients with low bone density, which is a key concern for implant success, how does my own bone density measurement affect which sinus lift technique might be safer or more effective for me?
5Given that this trial is listed as phase NA — meaning it's likely a surgical technique comparison rather than a drug trial — what are the known risks specific to each of these two internal sinus lift methods that I should weigh before deciding on a procedure?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Implant stability using the Osstell device by percentage